I have already explained I prefer close-order and open-order, rather than heavy and light, when referring to formations, and I reserve the terms heavy and light for degrees of protection, ie body armour and shields.
It is easiest to think of auxiliary infantry as what are often termed warband.
Indeed Thomas states that auxiliary infantry is simply a different name for what in his first book, Wargaming: An Introduction, was called warband.
However the difference between his categories of heavy infantry and biblical infantry needs more detail.
His heavy infantry are "well-drilled, often quite heavily armoured, and extremely formidable in hand-to-hand combat," whereas biblical infantry are "essentially a much less effective variety of heavy infantry."
I like the term biblical infantry, but I think Thomas's heavy infantry are better labelled professional infantry.
Since my ancient armies are composed of 10mm figures on 40x20mm bases, intended for figures up to twice as tall, I have different numbers from the 'official' ones on each base.
So a base of professional and biblical infantry has six figures in two rows of three (as do close-order archers), rather than the recommended four figures.
Similarly a base of auxiliary infantry has four figures rather than three, and a base of open-order infantry has three figures rather than two.
No comments:
Post a Comment