FOR refighting the Battle of the Apocryphal Well, I will use my modified version of Neil Thomas's biblical rules from his book, Ancient & Medieval Wargaming.
That means I need to convert Charles Grant's units, designed for the Wargames Research Group's ancient rules (probably the third edition), into A&MW units.
Under Thomas's rules, an army always consists of eight units, each usually made up of four bases.
At the Apocryphal Well, the Egyptians had eight units, and the Assyrians seven, so that is as near as darn it.
Grant's units, leaving aside the chariot squadron, varied in size from 18 figures for a unit of Egyptian javelinmen to 45 figures for a unit of Egyptian close-order spearmen.
The Assyrian units were more equal in size, varying from 20-man cavalry squadrons to a regiment of close-order archers numbering 31 figures.
In A&MW the number of figures on a base does not represent a certain number of soldiers. Rather, the figures tell more about the kinds of troops being represented.
There are five types of foot soldier: heavy infantry, biblical infantry, auxiliary infantry, heavy archers and light infantry.
Thomas's "heavy infantry" are effectively full-time soldiers who fight in close-order.
Generally, I have replaced the terms heavy and light with close-order and open-order, since heavy archers, for example, could easily have no armour or shield, relying on mass close-order shooting to make themselves effective.
Thomas's rules are designed primarily with 15mm figures in mind, using 40x20mm bases.
I have kept the base-size, but am using 10mm figures, so close-order infantry, including biblical infantry and close-order archers, are represented by six figures in two rows of three.
A base of auxiliaries - "disciplined troops who adopt a looser formation" - has four figures, approximately in two rows of two, and a base of open-order infantry has three figures, spaced relatively widely apart.
Mounted troops in A&MW have four categories: heavy cavalry, light cavalry, heavy chariots and light chariots.
I keep the terms heavy and light for the chariots, but usually call cavalry either close-order or open-order.
Taking the Assyrians at the Apocryphal Well first, there were two units of cavalry - one in close-order, carrying long spears and shields, as well as wearing body armour, and the other in open-order, carrying short spears and shields.
These are easily translated into an A&MW unit of close-order cavalry with medium armour (medium, rather than heavy, as the horses are unprotected) and a unit of open-order cavalry with light armour.
Leading the dismounted troops was a unit of infantry, armed with bows and spears, while wearing full mail, as well as carrying shields.
These troops translate into a "mixed unit" under A&MW special rules for the Assyrians. Such a unit, as well as fully functioning as spearmen, can shoot with half its bases each turn, even if moving.
Clearly, the men have heavy armour, and would almost certainly be rated as elite - a designation I think is also suitable for the close-order cavalry.
A second unit of close-order infantry has spears, shields and "half-armour," and are probably best rated in A&MW terms as having medium protection.
Two units of close-order archers are described as having neither shield nor armour. It could be argued that in A&MW they should not get a saving throw, but under Thomas's rules the lowest category of protection is "light armour," and, on balance, I think the Assyrians should receive this level of protection, rather than being denied a saving throw.
This can be rationalised as saying the archers had long robes, under which they would probably have worn a linen or woollen corselet.
Finally, a unit of open-order javelinmen has shields, and so under A&MW count as having light armour, and should probably be classed as levy, rather than "average."
The Egyptians at the Apocryphal Well are, if anything, easier to categorise.
"Pharoah's Chariot Squadron" becomes a unit of elite light chariots, which under A&MW rules have medium armour.
Three units of of close-order infantry, with spears and shields, become biblical infantry, "a much less effective variety of heavy infantry." Thomas classifies ordinary Egyptian spearmen as having light armour, rather than medium, despite their large shields.
The unit of open-order javelinmen, with shields, should be treated the same as its Assyrian counterpart, ie light armour, and levy rather than average.
Finally, there is the question of the three units of Egyptian open-order archers.
The only archers available in Thomas's Egyptian list are close-order bowmen with light armour.
However, Grant's three Egyptian archery units were definitely in open order, and that is what I will go with in A&MW.
The men have no protection from shield or body covering, but their open order probably entitles them to being classed under A&MW as having light armour.