As before the players are me and my regular wargaming opponent, who does not wish to be named, together with our mutual friends, security consultant Richard Johnson and Andy, a serving officer in Britain's armed forces.
Here are the standings (four points for a win, three for coming second, etc) after three games:
ANDY
Game One: 4pts (Macedonians)
Game Two: 3.5pts (Persians/Parthians)
Game Three: 3pts (Romans)
Total: 10.5pts
ME
Game One: 3pts (Carthaginians)
Game Two: 3.5pts (Romans)
Game Three: 4pts (Persians)
Total: 10.5pts
RICHARD JOHNSON
Game One: 2pts (Romans)
Game Two: 1pt (Macedonians)
Game Three: 2pts (Carthaginians)
Total: 5pts
REGULAR OPPONENT
Game One: 1pt (Persians/Parthians)
Game Two: 2pts (Carthaginians)
Game Three: 1pt (Macedonians)
Total: 4pts
SCORES BY PEOPLES
Persians/Parthians: 8.5pts
Romans: 8.5pts
Carthaginians: 7pts
Macedonians: 6pts
So it falls neatly that in this fourth game Andy will lead the Carthaginians, I will have the Macedonians, Richard the Persians/Parthians and my regular opponent will lead the Romans.
The situation in 350 BC |
The revolt dice (3-5) land on Pontus, which throws off Persian rule.
I am drawn first, and I attack Graecia, but roll 2.
The Romans are next, but they cannot do anything as they first have to consolidate their rule in ITALIA, and to do that must roll a die number lower than the turn number.
Richard's Persians attack AEGYPTUS, but roll 3.
Andy's Carthaginians sail for Sicilia, making the naval crossing with a 6 and conquering the island thanks to rolling 5, which is enough despite a -1 modifier for attacking outside of the original Carthaginian empire.
Carthage is off to a good start |
No comments:
Post a Comment